Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Vickers v. Dennis et al
as 4:2024cv04014
Plaintiff:
Victor Shane Vickers
Defendant:
Chief of Police Orlando Dennis, Former Sheriff Obie Simms, Sheriff Jeff Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutcherson v. Bowman et al
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Willie Hutcherson
Defendant:
Diane Bowman, Millie Hill and Shelly Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sasser et al v. Fowler Foods Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00195
Plaintiff:
Monique Hopkins, Kaleb Vickers, Samara Johnson and others
Defendant:
Southwest Arkansas Foods Inc, Fowler Foods Inc and Chris Fowler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JT Compton and Norma Vickers Compton Joint Irrevocable Trust v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 4:2018cv00528
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Plaintiff:
JT Compton and Norma Vickers Compton Joint Irrevocable Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knopick v. Marion County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2015cv05073
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Knopick
Defendant:
Marion County, Arkansas, Roger Vickers, George Calderia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Vickers
as 3:2015cv03010
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Don Stevens
Defendant:
Roger Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Vickers et al
as 5:2015cv05015
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
Roger Vickers and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Vickers et al
as 4:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D Stevens
Defendant:
Roger Vickers and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Vickers et al
as 3:2014cv03091
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
Roger Vickers, John Doe #1 & #2, Quorum Court of Marion County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Vickers et al
as 3:2013cv03109
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
Roger Vickers, David Johnson, Dan Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
