Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Chamberland et al v. Asbestos Corporation LTD. et al
as 3:2014cv00888
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Chamberland and Delila Chamberland
Cross Defendant:
Warren Pumps, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Presley v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00712
Defendant:
Meadwestvaco Corp., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Bucyrus International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Inc., United Technologies Corporation, CNA Holdings, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
The Gorman-Rupp Company, Pneumo Abex Corporation, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie K. Presley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Henderson v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
Erica Henderson
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation LTD., CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Trane US, Inc. , Crane Co. , Velan Valve Corp and others
Cross_defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation LTD., CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Knasinski et al v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jerome Knasinski and Janet Knasinski
Defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Aldrich Pump Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cross_claimant:
Brand Insulations, Inc. , ITT Corporation , Trane US, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Aldrich Pump Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watts v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Steven Watts
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Carver Pump Company , Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , York International Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Steven Watts , Carver Pump Company , 84 Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Burns v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00232
Cross Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Inc., Goulds Pumps Inc, McCord Gasket Company and others
Cross Claimant:
Howden North America, Inc., Carbonline Company, General Cable Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gordon v. Viking Pump Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08788
Defendant:
Viking Pump Inc., Dana Co LLC, ITT Industries Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Vivian Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Denton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01243
Defendant:
URS Energy & Construction, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., Rockwell Automation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Billie Denton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shewmake v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01223
Cross Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Inc., Crane Company, Beazer East, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Helen Pearl Shewmake
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Fulwider v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01220
Counter Defendant:
Ameron International Corporation, The Dow Chemical Company, Research-Cottrell, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Dap, Inc., Ralph Lewis Fulwider, Crane Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
