Cases 1 - 8 of 8
City of Camden et al v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company et al
as 2:2023cv03230
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, DuPont de Nemours Inc, The Chemours Company and others
Interested Party:
State of California, State of New Hampshire, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
City of Camden et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Interested Party:
State of Colorado, State of Hawaii, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Village of Bridgeport v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv02357
Plaintiff:
Village of Bridgeport
Defendant:
3M Company, EI DuPont de Nemours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Village of Bridgeport v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv02638
Plaintiff:
Village of Bridgeport
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04405
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TowerCo 2013, LLC v. The Village of Bridgeport, Ohio, et al.
as 2:2019cv01164
Defendant:
Joseph Lyle, Ben Lenz, David W Smith and others
Plaintiff:
TowerCo 2013, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry Moore, II v. Dwayne Pielech, et al
as 12-4275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY E. MOORE, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DWAYNE D. PIELECH, BELMONT COUNTY, VILLAGE OF BRIDGEPORT and others
Moore v. Pielech et al
as 2:2010cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jerry E Moore, II
Defendant:
Dwayne D Pielech, Belmont County Ohio, Village of Bridgeport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
