Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Bonilla v. Chhabria
as 4:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Vince Chhabria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Settle v. Vantell
as 1:2024cv01060
Petitioner:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRIS v. EMMONS
as 4:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Vince Martinez Harris
Respondent:
Warden SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Settle v. Vantell
as 3:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hernandez v. Vantell
as 3:2023cv00579
Petitioner:
Porfirio Hernandez
Respondent:
Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Vantell et al
as 3:2023cv00375
Petitioner:
Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Vince Vantell and Jonathan Skrmetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Metcalf-Small v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv03416
Petitioner:
Dayon Metcalf-Small and Neter Au Nuk-El
Respondent:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Gordon P. Galleghar and Vince Niski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Singletary v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv03446
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Dr. Theresa May, Ken Paxton and others
Petitioner:
Charleston Singletary
In Re:
Australia Jones
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ratcliff v. Lines
as 1:2020cv00763
Respondent:
Vince Lines
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Ratcliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
DAILEY v. BAZYLAK et al
as 2:2019cv01653
Respondent:
OFFICER VINCE MARKEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, MAYOR RICHARD BECK and others
Petitioner:
CHARLES DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
