Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LEON v. MAY
as 9:2023cv80761
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL CORALIA ALVAREZ LEON
Defendant:
VIRGINIA MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
May v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
Kelly Virginia May
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
May v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv12809
Plaintiff:
Virginia May
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , Johnson & Johnson Companies, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv06794
Plaintiff:
Virginia May
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Companies, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mays et al v. American Security Insurance Company
as 9:2015cv81426
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Mays and Virginia Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wing et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02098
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Wing and Virginia May Dudley
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wing et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00958
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Wing and Virginia May Dudley
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00767
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Machado v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2009cv01033
Plaintiff:
Virginia May Haynes Machado
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
