Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Gay v. State of South Carolina
as 9:2022cv01766
Petitioner:
Donald W. Gay
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay et al v. Allergan Sales, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00706
Defendant:
Ricardo E. Mojica and Allergan Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Gay and Pamela W. Gay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gay v. State of South Carolina et al
as 3:2019cv03474
Defendant:
Attorney General Alan Wilson, State of South Carolina, Lindsey A. McCallister and others
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
as 6:2019cv01819
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
Plaintiff:
W. W. Gay Mechanical Contractor, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Berg v. Nutraceutical International et al
as 2:2017cv00830
Plaintiff:
Robert Berg
Defendant:
Nutraceutical International, J. Kimo Esplin, James D. Stice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gay v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
James W. Gay
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Donald Gay v. State of South Carolina
as 15-7205
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD W. GAY
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CECELIA REYNOLDS, SCDC DIRECTOR and others
Gay v. Reynolds et al
as 9:2015cv02957
Plaintiff:
Donald W Gay
Defendant:
Cecilia Reynolds, Knox McMahon, Columbia Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. State of South Carolina et al
as 9:2015cv02134
Petitioner:
Donald W Gay
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Operating Engineers Local No. 474 Health and Welfare Fund v. Gay et al
as 3:2014cv01272
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local No. 474 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Joe W. Gay and Johnnie F. Gay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
