Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Coffman v. Kluck et al
as 6:2015cv00314
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Dustin H. Englutt, M. Franks, Richard W. Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rebector v. Maldonado et al
as 6:2015cv00269
Defendant:
Melody Blalock, Richard W. Harvey, Roger C. Hill, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
James Rebector
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rebector v. Maldonado et al
as 6:2015cv00268
Defendant:
Melody Blalock, Richard W. Harvey, Karen Lara and others
Plaintiff:
James Rebector
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramiro Canales v. Ronald Fox, et al
as 15-50488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMIRO CANALES
Defendant - Appellee:
ASSISTANT WARDEN RONALD C. FOX, Individual and Official Capacity, ASSISTANT WARDEN BRIAN P. BLANCHARD, Individual and Official Capacity, LIEUTENANT JOHN E. RITTER, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Harvey v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02465
Plaintiff:
Bajae W. Harvey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dillion v. Harvey et al
as 6:2013cv00345
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dillion
Defendant:
Richard W. Harvey, Dir.,C.M.H.C. Allen Hightower, Director Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv00600
Plaintiff:
Jerry W Harvey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harvey v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2013cv13412
Plaintiff:
Brian W Harvey, Sr
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Canales v. Thaler et al
as 6:2012cv00215
Respondent:
Counsel Sub. 1 James A. Ament, Capt. Richard W. Harvey, Sgt. Samantha Y. Mims and others
Petitioner:
Ramiro Canales
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
