Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Terrance Henderson v. J. Harmon
as 22-6029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE ROBERT HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. HARMON, Hearings Officer, Nottoway Correctional Center, CARL MANIS, Warden, Wallens State Prison and KAREN STAPLETON
Defendant:
W. R. HENSLEY, Hearings Officer, Wallens Ridge State Prison, DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, T. LEABOUGH and others
David Crawley v. George Hinkle
as 15-7511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EDWARD CRAWLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE M. HINKLE, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, W. R. HENSLEY and others
PULLIAM v. STAFFORD et al
as 1:2015cv00769
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY RAY PULLIAM
Defendant:
W. R. STAFFORD, J. WILLIAMS, KEITH ROY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00048
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03149
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Tuesdale et al
as 6:2012cv02746
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Ms Tuesdale, Mr Ragland, Mr Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Julian Rochester v. C. Harcuff
as 12-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
C. HARCUFF, Lieutenant, SERGEANT ATTWOOD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HAYNE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv02012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Florian et al
as 6:2012cv01985
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Chris Florian, Bob Peele, C M Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
