Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Ross v. Emerson, et al
as 5:2013cv00268
Respondent: Greg Abbott, Stephen Ables, D. Anastasadis and others
Petitioner: Vincent Dale Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00048
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03149
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03044
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Tuesdale et al
as 6:2012cv02746
Plaintiff: Julian E Rochester
Defendant: Ms Tuesdale, Mr Ragland, Mr Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Julian Rochester v. C. Harcuff
as 12-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant: JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee: C. HARCUFF, Lieutenant, SERGEANT ATTWOOD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HAYNE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv02012
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Florian et al
as 6:2012cv01985
Plaintiff: Julian E Rochester
Defendant: Chris Florian, Bob Peele, C M Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Martel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv03063
Plaintiff: Clifton Perry
Defendant: M. Martel, K. Chapelle, J. Curzon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malcolm Muhammad v. C. Stapleton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-6724
Plaintiff - Appellant: MALCOLM MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee: C. STAPLETON, W. R. HENSLEY and RANDY MATHENA
Defendant: M. STANFORD, B. RARIZEE, K. MASSEY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?