Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Pittman v. Georgia, State of et al
as 2:2021cv00785
Defendant:
Lenn Wood, Georgia, State of, Jonathan W Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen v. McMillon et al
as 1:2021cv00551
Plaintiff:
Thuy Nguyen
Defendant:
M. Brett Biggs, Cesar Conde, Marissa A. Mayer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Abt v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2021cv00172
Defendant:
Cesar Conde, Michael T. Duke, James W. Breyer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Abt
Burden et al v. Bazin et al
as 1:2021cv00182
Defendant:
Susan J. Hockfield, Richard A. Laxer, Steven M. Mollenkopf and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline S. Burden and Stephen J. Burden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gatubhai Mistry, et al v. Qualcomm, Inc., et al
as 20-56178
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS W. HORTON, DONALD J. ROSENBERG, PAUL E. JACOBS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD L. KOENIG, VANESSA D. WASHINGTON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GATUBHAI MISTRY, Lead Plaintiff and others
Horton v. Saul
as 8:2020cv02670
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Horton
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Freedom for Immigrants et al v. Etowah County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2020cv01301
Defendant:
Etowah County Sheriff's Office, Jonathan W Horton and Mike O'Bryant
Plaintiff:
Freedom for Immigrants and Etowah Visitation Project
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv63102
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES W HORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00534
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
