Cases 1 - 7 of 7
AXIA HOLDINGS LLC v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2020cv00411
Plaintiff:
AXIA HOLDINGS, LLC and AXIA HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
JAMES W. ROBINSON, US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, RICHIE A. ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
O'Connor v. Chatfield et al
as 2:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Megan K. Cavanagh, Lucas Middleton, Brian K. Zahra and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel W. Robinson et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02185
Defendant:
Universal American Mortgage Company of California, United Pacific Mortgage, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Darla J Robinson, Daniel W. Robinson and Miguel A. Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel W. Robinson et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08209
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, DOE, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel W Robinson, Darla J Robinson, Miguel A Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. 40.00 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in San Bernardino County, State of California et al
as 5:2016cv01190
Defendant:
40.00 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in San Bernardino County, State of California, Victoria Mae Braesch, Vera Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Hernandez et al v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
as 5:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Hernandez and Minerva Hernandez
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyd's London and William W. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc et al v. Daniel W Robinson et al
as 2:2013cv07142
Plaintiff:
Merscorp Holdings Inc and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc
Defendant:
Daniel W Robinson and Darla J Robinson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
