Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lane v. Williams et al
as 0:2023cv04299
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lane
Defendant:
Joseph Williams (RD), Warden Jackson, Major Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ira W. Thomas Jr v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03312
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ira W. Thomas, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nelson v. Palmer et al
as 5:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Terrell Nelson
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer, A/W Yolanda Turner, A/W Thomas Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Thomas v. Town of Mount Pleasant
as 2:2022cv01626
Plaintiff:
Craig W Thomas
Defendant:
Town of Mount Pleasant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Thomas et al v. Marion County Detention Center
as 0:2019cv00413
Plaintiff:
James Thomas, Walter Squirewell, James W. Thomas and others
Defendant:
Marion County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Thomas v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00892
Plaintiff:
Carrie W Thomas
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Pfizer International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Legg v. South Carolina et al
as 4:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Legg
Defendant:
South Carolina and W Thomas Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Legg v. Rhodes et al
as 4:2012cv00811
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Legg
Defendant:
Chief Rhodes, Neil Frebowitz, W Thomas Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Berkeley County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2011cv02816
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Simmons, Jr
Defendant:
Berkeley County Sheriff's Department , Robert W Thomas and Wayne Dewitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
