Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ZAMPITELLA v. WALGREENS COMPANY et al
as 4:2016cv00781
Plaintiff:
Dennis Zampitella
Defendant:
Walgreens Company , Kathy Kalowski , Brian Shut and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Ternes v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 0:2014cv04969
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Ternes
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreens Family of Companies: Income Protection Plan, Disability Income Protection Plan for Pharmacists and Registered Nurses
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Haberman v. Walgreen Co.
as 4:2014cv04149
Plaintiff:
Kevin Haberman
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burdge et al v. Walgreen Company
as 4:2014cv00566
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burdge , Jessaca Hope (Hanson) , Darrell Jones and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker et al v. Walgreen Company
as 4:2014cv01649
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Walker , Renae Holzem , Thomas McLaughlin and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Backes et al v. Walgreen Company
as 2:2014cv04255
Plaintiff:
Danielle Backes , Robert Davis and Jacob Day
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Eason v. Walgreen Co.
as 0:2013cv03184
Plaintiff:
Aaron Eason
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hootman v. Walgreens Family of Companies Income Protection (LTD) Plan for Store Managers et al
as 0:2013cv02641
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Hootman
Defendant:
Walgreens Family of Companies Income Protection (LTD) Plan for Store Managers, Walgreen Co. and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chasko et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 5:2013cv05191
Plaintiff:
Christine Chasko , Byron Banks , Matthew Barrett and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Teramura et al vs. Walgreen, Co. et al
as 5:2012cv05244
Plaintiff:
Kunio Teramura , Tou Chao Vang and Harry Shaffer
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
