Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Bralen Jordan v. David J. Ebbert, et al
as 21-1638
Defendant / Appellee:
BADRISCH, WATSON, Associate Program, T. CRAWFORD and others
Intervenor Defendant:
NURSE JEANA MITTERLING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN L. JORDAN
Roscoe Chambers v. David Ebbert, et al
as 20-3472
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MOYER, WARDEN DAVID J EBBERT, CERNEY, DHO Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Debtor / Appellee:
OLSHESKIE
SMITH v. EBBERT et al
as 2:2020cv01736
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT and ASSISTANT WARDEN COLBERT
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gordon ReidIn re: Gordon Reid
as 20-3140
Respondent:
JESSIE AYERS, A. GILLIGAN, MALACHY E. MANNION and others
Petitioner:
In re: GORDON C. REID
Kenneth Reid, et al v. Warden David J. Ebbert, et al
as 20-2699
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT and SEBAL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE, ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH R. REID
Kenneth Reid, et al v. Warden David J. Ebbert, et al
as 20-1590
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT
Defendant:
SEBAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Plaintiff:
ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES, SAMUEL GAINES and others
Kenneth Reid, et al v. Warden David J. Ebbert, et al
as 20-1195
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT and SEBAL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE, ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH R. REID
Chambers v. Ebbert
as 2:2019cv02819
Petitioner:
Demarcus L. Chambers
Respondent:
("The B.O.P.") United States Penitentiary Lewisburg and Warden David J Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 2:2019cv03537
Defendant:
C. MOORE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. EARP, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. HURLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY N. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
