Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cameron v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Cameron and Leslie Dewayne Cameron
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Warden Thompkins, Warden Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Rambo et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Officer Rambo, Officer Cook, Officer Lett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
Darryl Elton Scott
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Antonio McClain, Corrections Officer Hosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Malone et al
as 4:2018cv02064
Defendant:
Warden Jones, Sergeant Roberson, Officer Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Corderrius Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Ventress Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00545
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Ventress Correctional Facility, Warden Jones, Captain Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Jenkins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00250
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Captain Jenkins, Rene Mason, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Alabama Department of Corrections(INMATE2)
as 2:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrison
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Jones
as 1:2013cv00603
Petitioner:
Kelly Edward Duncan
Respondent:
Warden Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winfield v. Foster et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00046
Plaintiff:
Carey Edward Winfield
Defendant:
Michael Foster, Warden Jones and Officer Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Calhoun v. Allen et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv01027
Plaintiff:
Jeffery W. Calhoun
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Warden Jones, Warden Giles and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
