Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Scott v. Napier
as 8:2026cv04037
Petitioner:
Dejuan Scott
Respondent:
Warden S. Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Hutchins, Jr. v. S. Napier
as 26-6912
Petitioner:
ROBERT HUTCHINS, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN S. NAPIER
Anderson v. Napier
as 4:2026cv00683
Petitioner:
Dwayne Anderson
Respondent:
Warden S. Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Napier
as 9:2026cv00683
Petitioner:
Dwayne Anderson
Respondent:
Warden S. Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Montgomery v. Napier et al
as 9:2026cv00311
Plaintiff:
Christopher Todd Montgomery
Defendant:
Dr. M. Taylor, Lieutenant Hamilton, Lieutenant Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Younglove v. Napier
as 4:2026cv00122
Petitioner:
Louis Charles Younglove
Respondent:
Warden S. Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tyler v. Napier
as 4:2026cv00119
Petitioner:
Michael J Tyler and Michael James Tyler
Respondent:
Warden S. Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Long v. Napier
as 8:2025cv13138
Petitioner:
Avery Itez Long
Respondent:
Warden S. Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hobbs v. Laprise, et al
as 25-1881
Plaintiff:
ERICK RAHUMID HOBBS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BRIAN LAPRISE, individual and supervisory capacity, SUPERVISORY CHAPLAIN LEE, individual and supervisory capacity, ASSOCIATE WARDEN KOSAKOWSKI, individual and supervisory capacity and others
Hutchins v. Napier
as 2:2025cv07324
Respondent:
Warden S. Napier
Petitioner:
Robert Hutchins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
