Cases 21 - 30 of 1,249
Key v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv10458
Plaintiff:
Kelly Royce Key
Defendant:
Detroit, City of and Wayne County Treasurer
Burford v. Wayne County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Samuel Burford
Defendant:
Wayne County, Mississippi, Wayne County Sheriff's Department, James Tom Burford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwayne Seals v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE SEALS
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI and WAYNE COUNTY, MI EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Davis v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2024cv10203
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis and Robert Davis [E-filer]
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Alisha Bell, Martha G. Scott and others
Noel BrownIn re: Noel Brown
as 24-1135
Petitioner:
In re: NOEL BROWN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY WAYNE COUNTY
Southern Iowa Plumbing, L.L.C. v. Wayne County, Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Southern Iowa Plumbing, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Wayne County, Iowa, Wayne County Board of Health and David Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
West Virginia Laborers Pension Trust Fund v. The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Laborers Pension Trust Fund
Defendant:
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc., Fabrizio Freda and Tracey T. Travis
Petitioner:
Macomb County Employees Retirement System, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund and Wayne County Employees Retirement System
Larry Smith v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1030
Plaintiff:
LARRY SMITH
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, ROBERT J. DONALDSON, MONICA CHILDS and others
Larry Smith v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1031
Plaintiff:
LARRY SMITH
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI and MONICA CHILDS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
