Cases 21 - 30 of 137
McLendon v. Green et al
as 1:2022cv01303
Plaintiff:
Juan McLendon
Defendant:
Robert L. Green, Wayne Hill, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Hogan et al
as 1:2022cv01229
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Myers
Defendant:
Larry Hogan, Jeff Nines, Kevin Lamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Hill
Defendant:
Cody Jones, Dr. Mark Marquardt, Dr. Charles Rocci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HILL v. CASH AMERICA EAST INC
as 3:2022cv06019
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL
Defendant:
CASH AMERICA EAST INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Hill v. Michael Barnhart, et al
as 22-11540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDREW BARNHART and MEAGAN RENEE KERNS
Michael Hill v. Chip Klous
as 22-11535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIP ANDREW KLOUS
Albert Mills v. Lawrence Hogan
as 22-6421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, STEPHEN T. MOYER, Former Secretary, SECRETARY ROBERT L. GREEN and others
Turner v. Correctional Officer G. Porter et al
as 1:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Robert Douglas Turner
Defendant:
Correctional Officer G. Porter, Commissioner O. Wayne Hill, Secretary Robert L Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BARNHART et al
as 3:2022cv03202
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANDREW BARNHART and MEAGAN RENEE KERNS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Cruse v. Frost et al
as 1:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Iven Cornelius Cruse and Iven Cruz
Defendant:
Brian Frost, Warden Bettie Harris, Sgt. Sunni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
