Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Allen et al v. Hoover City Schools et al
as 2:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
Austin Allen and Wayne Shaw
Defendant:
Hoover City Schools, Hoover City Schools Board of Education, Earl Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CHANEY v. Taylor County School District et al
as 4:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
ERICA CHANEY
Defendant:
Taylor County School District , WAYNE SMITH , RUFUS CULLEN GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
USA v. Thomas Smith
as 11-13987
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS WAYNE SMITH
Wayne Smith v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-12799
Petitioner:
WAYNE DAVID SMITH, a.k.a. Wayne D. Smith, a.k.a. Wayne Smith, a.k.a. Scuz Smith
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Smith v. Peavy et al
as 5:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Van Peavy, Dominic Turner, Mike Brogdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv21507
Plaintiff:
Carlton Wayne Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walker v. Hallmark Bank & Trust, Ltd. et al
as 0:2009cv60746
Plaintiff:
Christopher Walker
Defendant:
Hallmark Bank & Trust, Ltd., Brian Trowbridge, Mastercard Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brantley et al v. International Paper Company
as 2:2009cv00230
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, Thomas L. Brantley, Thomas L. Brantley and others
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Smith v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
Douglas Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. Pfizer Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00168
Defendant:
Pfizer Corporation, UAB Medical West, UAB Medical West and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Wayne Smith
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
