Cases 1 - 10 of 15
WCA Waste Corporation v. Rodden et al
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
WCA Waste Corporation
Defendant:
Travis L. Rodden and Hogan Dedicated Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Fisher et al
as 4:2018cv00485
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Eric Fisher, Sloan Lowe and WCA Waste Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Rios v. WCA Waste Corporation
as 4:2018cv01503
Plaintiff:
Santiago Rios
Defendant:
WCA Waste Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jim Favre Construction Company v. WCA Waste Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Jim Favre Construction Company
Defendant:
WCA Waste Corporation , Waste Corporation of Arkansas LLC , Macquarie Infrastructure Partners II GP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WCA Waste Corporation v. Royal American Management, Inc, et al
as 16-90001
Petitioner:
WCA WASTE CORPORATION and WCA OF FLORIDA LLC
Respondent:
ROYAL AMERICAN MANAGEMENT, INC., RESERVE AT KANAPAHA II LTD, HUNTERS RUN APARTMENTS LTD and others
Ordonez v. WCA Waste Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv02312
Plaintiff:
Fredy Ordonez
Defendant:
WCA Waste Corporation , Manbro Contracting, LLC, Aurelio Alonso and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jim Favre Construction Company v. WCA Waste Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jim Favre Construction Company
Defendant:
WCA Waste Corporation and Waste Corporation of Arkansas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
