Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Wesley Carroll v. DOJ
as 19-7698
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESLEY CARROLL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Carroll v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2019cv01035
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. United States Department of Justice
as 4:2019cv00034
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Wesley Carroll
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Wesley Carroll v. USPS
as 15-6377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, PATRICK R. DONAHOE, CEO, U.S. Postal Service, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, CONSUMER AFFAIRS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-6379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carroll v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2011cv03005
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Michell Harmon and Office of Public Inquiry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesley Carroll v. Department of the Army
as 11-7302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency
Wesley Carroll v. USPS
as 11-7304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, PATRICK R. DONAHOE, CEO, U.S. Postal Service, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, CONSUMER AFFAIRS OFFICE and others
Carroll v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Reverend Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe, U. S. Postal Service Consumer Affairs, U. S. Postal Service Headquarters Consumer Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Department of the Army
as 4:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Reverend Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
