Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Newkirk v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Lt. KM Fleming, Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lively v. Westfall
as 1:2020cv00230
Respondent:
Warden Aaron Westfall, Betsy Jividen and Record Clerk
Petitioner:
Mark Leslie Lively
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Westfall v. Tichnell et al
as 8:2020cv00271
Defendant:
Charles Goldstrom, Andrew Tichnell and Cumberland, MD. City Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Westfall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Westfall v. Tichwell et al
as 8:2019cv00219
Defendant:
Cumberland City Police Dept., Allegany County Circuit Court, Officer Andrew Tichwell and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Westfall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Reed v. Westfall et al
as 1:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Phil Huff, Cleve Westfall, Jasmine Morton and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin C. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Alex Hamilton
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, West Virginia Division Of Corrections, Salem Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Willis et al
as 0:2015cv04215
Plaintiff:
Gregory McDaniel
Defendant:
Kirk Willis, Jeremy Ashford, Jeffrey Westfall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Miller, Jr. v. Riley Maxwell
as 14-6761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES MILLER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RILEY MAXWELL, Assistant Solicitor, JEFF TALBERT, MAGGIE BOYD and others
Roberts v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Harold Loyld Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , Cheryl Burks and Mary Westfall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
