Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Conway v. Wexford Medical Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Chad Conway
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Sources Inc., IDOC Medical Director, Percy Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Pringle v. Governor of Alabama, et al
as 22-10895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD L. PRINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCES, INC., Medical Provider and DOCTOR PAPERONIAS
Bryant v. Ahmed et al
as 1:2021cv01121
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bryant
Defendant:
Riliwan Ojelade, Vipin Shah, Mohammed Siddiqui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUZIER v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCE et al
as 2:2021cv00072
Defendant:
CHERYL PETTY, JANE DOE, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VICKERY v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCE et al
as 2:2020cv00566
Defendant:
CHERYL PETTY, JANE DOE, MICHEAL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY VICKERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Ivey et al
as 1:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Doctor Bose, Therapist Pearson, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Nevis Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle v. Ivey et al
as 1:2020cv00294
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Pringle
Defendant:
Nurse Morgan, Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Wexford Medical Source et al
as 3:2019cv00222
Defendant:
C/O Korte, Sgt. Migneren, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVES v. HOBSON et al
as 2:2018cv00077
Defendant:
K. GILMORE, ESTHER HINTON, KIM HOBSON and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. REAVES
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
English v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2017cv04239
Plaintiff:
Johnny English
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Medical Sources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
