Cases 31 - 40 of 217
McDaniel v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01711
Plaintiff:
Edward McDaniel and Laura McDaniel
Defendant:
Revlon Inc., Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. and Revlon, Inc. as Successor-in-Interest to Jean Nate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 as
CARBALLO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00636
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA CARBALLO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO AMERICAN TALC COMPANY, METROPOLITAN TALC COMPANY, INC., CHARLES MATHIEU, INC., RESOURCE PROCESSORS, INC. AND WINDSOR MINERALS, MINERAL AND PIGMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. f/k/a WHITTAKER, CLARK & DANIELS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff et al v. Avon Products Inc et al
as 7:2019cv02570
Defendant:
Coty Inc, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Breentag Specialties Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ennis Ratliff and Lynda Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14903
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14880
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14913
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
