Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01058
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cope v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00288
Defendant:
State of Alabama DOC, Steven T Marshall and Patrice Richie Jones
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cope v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00045
Defendant:
State of Alabama, D.O.C., Steven T. Marshall and Patrice Richie Jones
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cope v. Freddrick (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00194
Defendant:
Nurse Freddrick
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Ivey et al
as 5:2019cv00776
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Revenue, Kay Ivey and Vernon Barnett
Plaintiff:
Max S Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Tower Loans and Gulfco et al
as 5:2018cv01861
Defendant:
Alabama State Banking Commission, Tower Loans and Gulfco and Alabama Department of Insurance
Plaintiff:
Frances Denise Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cope v. Freddrick et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00831
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Nurse Freddrick
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Montgomery County Commission et al
as 5:2018cv01501
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Revenue, Steve Marshall, John Merrill and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cope v. Freddrick et al
as 2:2018cv01334
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Freddrick
Petitioner:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Hancock et al
as 5:2018cv00552
Plaintiff:
Denise Cope
Defendant:
Daniel Hancock, Wolfe Jones Hancock Daniel & South LLC, Scott Vowell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
