Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Smith v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01528
Plaintiff:
William Wayne Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
GUARDIPEE et al v. RAJ TRANSPORT, INC., et al
as 1:2020cv00833
Plaintiff:
ANNA N. GUARDIPEE and ANDREW S. BURTON
Defendant:
RAJ TRANSPORT, INC. and WILLIAM B. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
SMITH v. SLOAN
as 1:2017cv00684
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. SMITH
Defendant:
CAMRON SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DAVIE COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS et al
as 1:2017cv00326
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. SMITH
Defendant:
DAVIE COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS and DAVIE COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRATOR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. HILL
as 1:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. SMITH
Defendant:
B. HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. v. BILL SMITH FORD, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
BILL SMITH FORD, INC. , WILLIAM C. SMITH, JR. , BSI PERFORMANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. American Express Bank, FSB et al
as 3:2015cv00535
Plaintiff:
William Ashley Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
American Express Bank, FSB, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Transunion, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Brittany McPhail and Jimmy McPhail
Defendant:
David Felton, Justin Gorman, Brad Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPhail et al v. Felton et al
as 4:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Brittany McPhail and Jimmy McPhail
Defendant:
David Felton , Justin Gorman , Brad Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BeoCare Group, Inc. et al v. Morrissey
as 5:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
BeoCare Group, Inc. and Beocare, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael J. Morrissey , Medical Knitted Structures, Inc. , Garrett Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
