Cases 41 - 50 of 146
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00765
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Campbell v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04483
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
William Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPBELL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv08532
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2019cv00241
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transit Authority Police Department, Michael Hertling, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
William Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aepelbacher et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12030
Plaintiff:
Rory Walsh, Brian Hilderbrand, Marianne Fabozzi and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Campbell et al v. Pizza Hut of America, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00688
Plaintiff:
Tracy Campbell and William Campbell
Defendant:
YUM! Brands, Inc., John and Jane Does 1-10 and Pizza Hut of America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Campbell v. USA
as 18-13329
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
William Campbell v. USA
as 18-12354
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: William Campbell
as 18-10721
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM CAMPBELL
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Moore v. Cosarrubias et al
as 1:2018cv00259
Defendant:
Cosarrubias, Andriello, Walters and others
Plaintiff:
L. R. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
