Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
William Curtis v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2921
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN E. WETZEL and STEWART
William Curtis v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2442
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN E. WETZEL, Commissioner Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, J. BIRMINGHAM, PSS, T. BOLTON, PSS and others
Defendant: STEWART, LAUREL R. HARRY, Department of Corrections Secretary, FRANCIS J. FEILD, PSS and others
William Curtis v. John Wetzel, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2000
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM CURTIS
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN E. WETZEL, Commissioner PA. Dept of Corrections
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee: J. BIRMINGHAM, T. BOLTON, BRANNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01696
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CURTIS v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00786
Plaintiff: WILLIAM CURTIS
Defendant: JOHN WETZEL, KLOPOTOSKI, ROBIN M. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63714
Plaintiff: WILLIAM CURTIS WILSON
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURTIS et al v. BORG-WARNER CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv02863
Plaintiff: WILLIAM CURTIS and CAROL CURTIS
Defendant: BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, BRAKE SYSTEMS, INC., GENUINE PARTS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURTIS v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2007cv03391
Petitioner: TYRONE WILLIAM CURTIS
Respondent: CHARLES SAMUELS, MEDICAL DEPT. FORT DIX, REGIONAL OFFICE PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?