Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Carroll v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01898
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
William D. Carroll, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 8:2016cv03064
Petitioner:
William D Carroll
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARROLL v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2016cv00837
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. CARROLL
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARROLL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2016cv00783
Petitioner:
WILLIAM D. CARROLL
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
William Carroll, Jr., et al v. Samera Abide, et al
as 16-30320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. CARROLL, JR., CAROLYN K. CARROLL and PAMELA CARROLL ALONSO
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMERA L. ABIDE and XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY
CARROLL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 8:2016cv00713
Petitioner:
William D Carroll
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Carroll, Jr., et al v. Samera Abide, et al
as 14-31230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. CARROLL, JR., CAROLYN K. CARROLL and PAMELA CARROLL ALONSO
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMERA L. ABIDE and XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY
Carroll et al v. Abide et al
as 3:2014cv00503
Defendant:
Samera L. Abide and XYZ Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Pamela Carroll Alonso, Carolyn K. Carroll and William D. Carroll, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Carroll, Jr., et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 13-31134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. CARROLL, JR. and CAROLYN CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Pamela Alonso, et al v. Samera Abide, et al
as 13-30723
Appellant:
PAMELA J. ALONSO and CYNTHIA G. O'NEAL
Appellee:
SAMERA L ABIDE, Trustee for Redpen Properties, L.L.C., Carolyn K. Carroll, REDPEN PROPERTIES, L.L.C., WILLIAM D. CARROLL, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
