Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clement v. Malewski et al
as 2:2016cv12947
Plaintiff:
Larisa Clement
Defendant:
Aaron Malewski , Farmington DPS, City of , William F Galvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reade, Jr. v. Galvin
as 16-1555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM FREDERICK READE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM F. GALVIN, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Boston Taxi Owners Association, et al v. Evan
as 16-1412
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BOSTON TAXI OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., RAPHAEL OPHIR and JOSEPH PIERRE
Defendant:
CITY OF BOSTON, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM EVANS, Boston Police Commissioner
Interested Party:
STEVAN JOHNSON
Boston Taxi Owners Association, Inc. et al v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2015cv10100
Plaintiff:
Boston Taxi Owners Association, Inc. , Raphael Ophir and Joseph Pierre
Defendant:
City of Boston , William Evans , Department of Public Utilities and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Opaleye Management, Inc. v. Galvin
as 1:2014cv10391
Plaintiff:
Opaleye Management, Inc.
Defendant:
William F. Galvin and Bryan J. Lantagne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reade, Jr. v. Galvin, et al
as 12-2406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM FREDERICK READE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM F. GALVIN and MARTHA COAKLEY
Goldstein v. Galvin
as 12-2184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP GOLDSTEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM F. GALVIN, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Goldstein v. Galvin
as 1:2010cv10139
Plaintiff:
Phillip Goldstein
Defendant:
William F. Galvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARCIA v. CITY OF NORTH BERGEN et al
as 2:2008cv06411
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTH BERGEN, NORTH BERGEN POLICE DEPT., THERESA FERRARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
