Cases 1 - 10 of 16
WARREN v. GANTMAN et al
as 5:2019cv02581
Defendant:
MARY P. MURRAY, ALICE BECK DUBOW, JANE DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tryboski v. Platt et al
as 1:2017cv02042
Plaintiff:
Julie Tryboski
Defendant:
William H. Platt, Patricia H. Jenkins and Jacqueline O. Shogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PISKANIN v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2015cv00354
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PISKANIN
Defendant:
JAMES B. MARTIN, KELLY L. BANACH, WILLIAM H. PLATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2014cv02376
Petitioner:
THOMAS DUANE TAYLOR
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN and WILLIAM H. PLATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv00516
Petitioner:
THOMAS DUANE TAYLOR
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN and WILLIAM H. PLATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Piskanin v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv02937
Plaintiff:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Gerald Casner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. VILUSHIS et al
as 1:2013cv00199
Plaintiff:
TAVEREN ROBINSON
Defendant:
CHAD VILUSHIS, MARK M. RICHMOND, JOHN A. BOZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PISKANIN v. BANACH et al
as 5:2013cv03257
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
KELLY L. BANACH, WILLIAM H. PLATT and JAMES B. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PISKANIN v. U.S.ATTORNEY MICHAEL LEVY et al
as 3:2011cv00251
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Respondent:
U.S.ATTORNEY MICHAEL LEVY, HONORABLE KEDLY L. BANACH, WILLIAM H. PLATT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PISKANIN v. BRAMBLETT et al
as 5:2011cv05601
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOH PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN REID BRAMBLETT, JOAN ORIE MELVIN, RICHARD KLEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
