Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KEELEY v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2021cv03575
Petitioner:
DEBORAH A. KEELEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OLIVER, JUDGE WILLIAM P. MAHON, D.A. DEBORAH S. RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KEELEY v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2021cv03159
Petitioner:
DEBORAH ANNE KEELEY
Respondent:
LT. OLIVER, WILLIAM P. MAHON, DA DEBORAH S RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEELEY v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2021cv00175
Petitioner:
DEBORAH ANNE KEELEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OLIVER, JUDGE WILLIAM P MAHON, DA DEBORAH S RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randall Winslow v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, et al
as 20-1475
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHESTER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL WINSLOW
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION
HORSCH v. MAHON et al
as 2:2020cv01154
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAY HORSCH
Defendant:
RYAN HYDE, DIANE CLEMENS and JUDGE WILLIAM P. MAHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILLIAM ALLEN v. MAHON
as 2:2018cv02793
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE NICOLE GILLIAM ALLEN
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIAM P. MAHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMEL SHANCK A/K/A ALEXANDER WILLIAMS v. WEST CHESTER CO D.A. OFFICE et al
as 2:2017cv01751
Petitioner:
JAMEL SHANCK
Respondent:
WEST CHESTER CO D.A. OFFICE, HENLEY and WILLIAM P. MAHON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
