Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Baker et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2023cv08033
Plaintiff:
Nancy Baker, Elizabeth Hall, Evans Ehardt and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Jones v. Robinson et al
as 1:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Martellus Jones
Defendant:
William Robinson and Anniel Vidal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SEALED DEFENDANT #9 v. USA
as 5:2019cv00699
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. Viacom, Inc.
as 1:2017cv05954
Plaintiff:
William Robinson
Defendant:
Viacom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Robinson v. Viacom Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05739
Plaintiff:
William Robinson
Defendant:
Viacom Inc. and Funny or Die
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Robinson et al v. Lynch et al
as 6:2015cv06765
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Kubow, Kenneth E. Mathison, Harold W. Schroeder and others
Defendant:
Thomas E. Brandon, James B. Comey, Loretta E. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Clark et al
as 1:2015cv08434
Plaintiff:
William Robinson
Defendant:
Morris Clark, Dawn Osselmann, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ley v. Novelis Corporation
as 5:2014cv00775
Petitioner:
Rhonda P. Ley
Defendant:
Novelis Corporation
Intervenor:
Richard Farrands, John Tesoriero, Michael W. Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Eccleston et al
as 1:2013cv06070
Plaintiff:
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Mulvina Eccleston, John Doe #1 through John Doe #6, Agatha Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
SEALED DEFENDANT #9 v. USA
as 5:2012cv01777
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
