Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gaines v. Windsor C-1 School Board et al
as 4:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gaines
Defendant:
Windsor C-1 School Board, Dr. Rachel Montgomery, Dr. Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sours et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2019cv00441
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, John Ashcroft, Stanley Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene V. LaMartina and William Scott Sours
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson et al v. Evans Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01791
Defendant:
Evans Services, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Nationwide Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
William Scott Peterson and Autumn Growth Peterson
3Rd Party Defendant:
Crawford & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sours v. Karr et al
as 3:2015cv05075
Plaintiff:
William Scott Sours
Defendant:
Chad Karr, Tommy Kitch, J Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sours v. Arnott et al
as 6:2012cv03397
Petitioner:
William Scott Sours
Respondent:
James Arnott and U.S. Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scott v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv05084
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
William Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Newman et al
as 4:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Roy Newman, Brian William Scott and RNB, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Fink v. Kirkwood, City of, Police Officers and Firefighters Pension Fund
as 4:2010cv01883
Plaintiff:
William Scott Fink
Defendant:
Kirkwood, City of, Police Officers and Firefighters Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Dyer, et al. v. Blankenship, et al
as 4:2007cv02105
Plaintiff:
Keith Robert Dyer, by and through his personal representative Colleen Kean
Defendant:
Don Blankenship, Individually and in his capacity as Phelps County Sheriff, William Scott Jones, City of Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
