Cases 31 - 40 of 607
Dodds v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04040
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Dodds
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02403
Petitioner:
William Thomas Carey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02405
Petitioner:
William Thomas Carey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bhakta et al v. Thomas, Jr. et al
as 2:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Suryakant Bhakta and Savitaben Bhakta
Defendant:
Eddie Williams Thomas, Jr. and Tri National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ROSEN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL D ROSEN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, HORNORABLE CHARLES T CANADY, HONORABLE JUAN FERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SEELEY v. MCCORMACK
as 2:2022cv06172
Plaintiff:
ERIC SEELEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM THOMAS MCCORMACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Thomas v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Melinda Masters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20886
Plaintiff:
ERIC WILLIAM THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox v. Clayton
as 5:2022cv00904
Petitioner:
William Thomas Cox
Respondent:
Deon Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Kappa Sigma Fraternity et al
as 3:2022cv00808
Defendant:
Kappa Sigma Fraternity, Kappa Sigma International Fraternity, Kappa Iota and others
Plaintiff:
Jalen Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
