Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Williams v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
William Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. LaJoye-Young
as 1:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
William Williams
Respondent:
Michelle LaJoye-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Walker
as 3:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
William Williams
Defendant:
Sandra Walker
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21049
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodeau v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Joshua Goodeau
Defendant:
William Williams, Erik Gomez, Kyle Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Garza
Defendant:
State of Nevada, William Williams, C/O Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JTH Tax, LLC v. Beckwith et al
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax, LLC doing business as Liberty Tax Service
Defendant:
Ashley Beckwith, Williams Williams, LTS Wilmington LLC each individually doing business as Tax Topic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Garza v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Garza
Defendant:
State of Nevada and William Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Naughton
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
William Williams
Defendant:
Martin Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Williams
as 21-30719
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
William Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
