Cases 41 - 50 of 3,951
Ali v. Sledge et al
as 5:2024ct03080
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Wendy Sledge, Kenneth Washington, William Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lozano-Bustos v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02036
Petitioner:
William Lozano-Bustos
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hopkins v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Rosie Hopkins
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Department of Health and Human Service Health Care Registry, Villages of Apex Club and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Clarence Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Mulder v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02070
Petitioner:
William Brian Mulder
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCCLARY v. BULLARD et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCCLARY
Defendant:
WILLIAM BULLARD, DOWD and RANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Atrium Health et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert Price
Defendant:
Atrium Health, Southern Health Partners, Ashley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mitchell v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
William Antonio Mitchell
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Reginald Randolph Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
