Cases 31 - 40 of 233
Smith v. Bennett et al
as 7:2016cv01745
Plaintiff:
Seron Smith
Defendant:
William Bennett, John Hutton, Willie Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Thomas et al
as 7:2016cv01705
Plaintiff:
Kennis Lee Lati Avery
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Debra Toney, Willie Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. White et al
as 5:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Douglas, Jr
Defendant:
Rosemary White , Joyce Scott , Willie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zaman v. Thomas et al
as 7:2016cv01677
Petitioner:
Bilal Uz Zaman
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Loyde v. Thomas et al
as 7:2016cv01662
Plaintiff:
Joe Lenard Loyde
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Debra Tony and Willie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeton v. Odom
as 7:2016cv01544
Petitioner:
Darren Owen Keeton
Respondent:
Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roy Rutledge v. State of Alabama, et al
as 16-16083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY M. RUTLEDGE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, KIM THOMAS, in his former individual and official capacities as Commissioner for the Alabama Department of Corrections, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in his current official capacity as Commissioner for the Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Crawford v. Hutton et al
as 7:2016cv01469
Plaintiff:
Thomas Crawford
Defendant:
John Hutton, Sgt. Hines, David Pavlokovic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bennett et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
Seron Smith
Defendant:
William Bennett, John Hutton, Willie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gafford v. Dunn et al
as 7:2016cv01437
Plaintiff:
David Scott Gafford
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bently and Willie Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
