Cases 1 - 10 of 33
WINKLER v. ANDRZEJCZAK et al
as 1:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WINKLER
Defendant:
THOMAS ANDRZEJCZAK, TAD ACKER and BOROUGH OF CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
STROUGO v. UNISYS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv04529
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STROUGO
Defendant:
UNISYS CORPORATION, PETER A. ALTABEF and DEBRA WINKLER MCCANN
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION et al v. BEASELY et al
as 2:2022mc00041
Receiver:
GEOFF WINKLER
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MATTHEW WADE BEASELY, BEASLEY LAW GROUP PC, JEFFREY J JUDD and others
Miechkovski et al v. Winkler + Dunnebier GMBH et al
as 3:2020cv02207
Plaintiff:
Voytech Miechkovski and Dorota Miechkovski
Defendant:
Winkler + Dunnebier GMBH, Barry-Wehmiller Companies, Inc. and W + D Nnorth America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ziolkiewicz et al v. Winkler + Dunnebier GMBH et al
as 3:2019cv01269
Plaintiff:
Krzysztof Ziolkiewicz and Agnieszka Ziolkiewicz
Defendant:
Winkler + Dunnebier GMBH, W+D North America Inc. and Barry-Wehmiller Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINKLER v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv02039
Plaintiff:
NOLAN WINKLER
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC. et al v. THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH
as 5:2016cv04504
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC. , STEPHEN MEHOLIC , DAVID SIMPSON and others
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
