Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Wolff v. Rose
as 5:2024ct03108
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Wolff
Defendant:
Dallas Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adams et al v. Holston Medical Group, P.C.
as 3:2020cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Little, Colleen Harkreader, Venessa Everett and others
Defendant:
Holston Medical Group, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Common Cause et al v. Representative David R. Lewis et al
as 5:2018cv00589
Plaintiff:
REBECCA JOHNSON, PAULA ANN CHAPMAN, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore, Joshua Malcolm, RALPH E HISE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Wolff et al v. Rutherford Hospital, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
Roger K. Wolff and Sharren E. Wolff
Defendant:
Rutherford Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sechrist et al v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
Kirby Dale Sechrist and Twyla P. Sechrist
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., Aurora Pump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ISENHOUR v. A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv00626
Plaintiff:
LOUISE H. ISENHOUR
Defendant:
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALFA LAVAL, INC., AURORA PUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS et al v. A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv00627
Plaintiff:
JACKSON WAYNE DAVIS and DORIS GREEN DAVIS
Defendant:
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALFA LAVAL, INC., AURORA PUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
