Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Woods Cross City v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04235
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Woods Cross City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martin v. Singleton et al
as 2:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Travis B. Martin and Travis Ben Martin
Defendant:
Charles Singleton, Ryan LaBounty, Colby Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Newey et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Mikel Ray Brown and Mikel Brown
Defendant:
Reid Newey, John Robison, Blake Haycock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bain v. Bain et al
as 2:2017cv01305
Plaintiff:
Nikole Ann Bain
Defendant:
Lynne Bain , Larry Bain , Mandy Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Webb v. State of Utah, et al
as 16-4199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, ALPINE CITY, AMERICAN FORK CITY and others
Webb v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
State of Utah, Alpine City, American Fork City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Oakden et al v. Woods Cross Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
William C. Oakden, III and Karli Anne Miller
Defendant:
Woods Cross Police Department, Adam Osoro, West Bountiful City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cavanaugh v. Woods Cross City, et al
as 11-4206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANNON CAVANAUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
WOODS CROSS CITY and DANIEL DAVIS
Cavanaugh, et al v. Woods Cross City, et al
as 10-4017
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHANNON CAVANAUGH and BRAD CAVANAUGH
Defendant - Appellant:
WOODS CROSS CITY and DANIEL DAVIS
Cavanaugh et al v. Woods Cross City et al
as 1:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Shannon Cavanaugh, Shannon Cavanaugh, Brad Cavanaugh and others
Defendant:
Woods Cross City and Daniel Davis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
