Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jennings v. Flanagan et al
as 5:2021ct03004
Defendant:
William Woodward Webb, Sr., Magistrate Judge Gates, Louise W. Flanagan and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marquis Jennings and Mustafa Beezy Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Small et al
as 5:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Randy Shores, Wendy Kelley, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Woodward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Reid et al
as 5:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodward
Defendant:
Coy Reid and John & Jane Does
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodward v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodward
Defendant:
FNU Davis, John Doe, FNU Cravitt and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodward v. Transport Officer et al
as 5:2018ct03134
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Woodward
Defendant:
Transport Officer, 1 and Transport Officer, 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Clonniger et al
as 3:2018cv00220
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Woodward
Defendant:
Alan Clonniger, Kim LNU, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Spence et al v. Spence et al
as 5:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Kimberly T. Spence and William M. Windsor
Defendant:
Kimberly T. Spence, Wellstar Medical Group Pediatric & Adolescent Center, Roman Catholic Church Cardinals and others
Petitioner:
Carl J. Willis, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woodward v. Daugherty et al
as 5:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Woodward
Defendant:
Gayla Hoyle , Ted Overcash , Kerry Neal and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodward v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2010hc02254
Petitioner:
Randy E. Woodward
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woodward-Mitchell v. NetIQ Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
Mary B. Woodward-Mitchell
Defendant:
NetIQ Corporation, The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company and Group Long Term Disability and Life Plan for Employees of NETIQ CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
