Cases 51 - 60 of 133
BRETSCHER v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2019cv00332
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Plaintiff:
MARILYN BRETSCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REYNOLDS v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES INC RETAIL STORE #2081
as 2:2019cv00209
Plaintiff:
MARK D REYNOLDS
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES INC RETAIL STORE #2081
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DUFFY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 2:2019cv00203
Plaintiff:
JOYCE DUFFY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Cambridge v. Purdue Pharma L.P. d/b/a Purdue Pharma (Delaware) Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2019cv11005
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Cambridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Town of Randolph v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv10813
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust
as 1:2019cv10624
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico Inc.
as 3:2018cv02008
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Puerto Rico Inc.
Plaintiff:
christopher king
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 2:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
JAMES KING and MAUREEN KING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CITY OF PORTLAND v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 2:2018cv00282
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA LP and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PORTLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Logan v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00335
Plaintiff:
Patricia Logan
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. , Sam's West, Inc. , Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
