Cases 1 - 10 of 180
RIVERS III v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2024cv02919
Plaintiff:
LOUIS N. RIVERS III
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Martin v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc
as 8:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Christopher Martin
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 7:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Ke'Andre Demarcus Kennedy
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Langston v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02976
Plaintiff:
Tameka Langston
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rock v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Staci B. Rock
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Jean v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 9:2023cv81026
Plaintiff:
SINDY JEAN
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Stroud v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Michaela Stroud
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gregory v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Gregory
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., d/b/a Wal-Mart and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. doing business as Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Byther v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Connie Byther
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Vargas v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
as 3:2023cv50108
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
