Cases 71 - 80 of 161
Robinson v. Walt Disney Company et al
as 4:2015cv03216
Plaintiff:
Dyke Robinson
Defendant:
Walt Disney Company and Disney Consumer Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Kims Kreations Inc v. Walt Disney Company
as 2:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Kims Kreations Inc
Defendant:
Walt Disney Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKain et al v. Pixar Animation Studios et al
as 3:2015cv01044
Plaintiff:
Antoinette McKain and GACM, Inc
Defendant:
Pixar Animation Studios, John Lasseter, Jonas Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Axcess International, Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company et al
as 1:2015cv04353
Plaintiff:
Axcess International, Inc.
Defendant:
The Walt Disney Company and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Battery On The Go, Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company
as 1:2015cv21973
Plaintiff:
Battery On The Go, Inc.
Defendant:
The Walt Disney Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Horizon Comics Productions, Inc. v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv11684
Plaintiff:
Horizon Comics Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Marvel Entertainment, LLC , MVL Film Finance, LLC , Marvel Worldwide Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
InCom Corporation v. The Walt Disney Company
as 2:2015cv03011
Plaintiff:
InCom Corporation
Defendant:
The Walt Disney Company
Abdullah v. Walt Disney Company et al
as 2:2015cv11346
Defendant:
Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Pictures, WALT DISNEY MOTION PICTURES GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Muneefa Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Feldman v. Rhimes, et al
as 15-1130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBRA FELDMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHONDA RHIMES, JENNA BANS, SHIPS AT A DISTANCE and others
Daniel Morken v. Pure Fishing, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09553
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., BPS Direct, LLC, Cabelas, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Morken
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
