Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Iturri Estupinan v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Walter Iturri Estupinan
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Palmer v. Duffy et al
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Tyrelle Palmer
Defendant:
Walter Duffy, Anzoumana Bamba, Ryan Legare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
Vidot v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Xavier T. Vidot
Defendant:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Richard Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Letourneau v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Devon Denzel Letourneau and Shabazz Be Allah
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Patricia A. Coyne-Fague, Richard Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Coyne-Fague, et al
as 22-1290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY G. GONZALEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, Director, WALTER DUFFY, Captain, BILLIE-JO GALLAGHER, Grievance Coordinator and others
Muller-Colon v. USA
as 3:2022cv01121
Petitioner:
Walter D. Muller-Colon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Palmer v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2021cv00421
Plaintiff:
Tyrelle Palmer
Defendant:
Patricia Coyne-Fague, Lynne Corry, Rachel Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tony G. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Patricia Coyne-Fague, Walter Duffy, Billie-Jo Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chan v. Cirilli et al
as 1:2021cv11135
Plaintiff:
Schultz Chan and Songjiang Wang
Defendant:
David J Cirilli, Sarah E Walters, Stephen E Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
