Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, CRPN Aplinlin, Jennifer McCovery and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Collier et al
as 6:2018cv00212
Defendant:
Nurse Mildred Daniel, Med Branch Manager Pam Paci, Warden Boyd Unit Cythia Tilley and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Douglas Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Draper Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00895
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Brice Dees
Defendant:
Draper Correctional Facility, Warden Boyd, Patricia Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Stein et al
as 3:2015cv00473
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Doctor Stein, Neil Turner, Deputy Warden Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Alabama, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00840
Plaintiff:
Ticcarrio Smith
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Warden Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd Ware v. Kay Sheeley, et al
as 12-50359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD BRYANT WARE
Defendant - Appellee:
KAY SHEELEY, Warden, Boyd Unit and RACHEL WEST, Classification, Boyd Unit
Hall v. Love et al
as 3:2010cv00703
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Hall
Defendant:
Chaplain Love, Assistant Warden Boyd, Warden Ryker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Boyd
as 1:2009cv00796
Petitioner:
Ronnie Odell Parker
Respondent:
Warden Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Walker et al
as 3:2009cv00888
Plaintiff:
Curtis Richardson
Defendant:
Roger Walker, Lee Ryker, Assistant Warden Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawthorne v. Pace, et al
as 09-50093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON L HAWTHORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
R W PACE, also known as R W Pacegard, BENNY BROWN, Assistant Warden, Boyd Unit, JEFFREY JONES, Seargent and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
