Cases 1 - 10 of 714
Rando Saavedra-Ramirez v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1738
Plaintiff:
RANDO SAAVEDRA-RAMIREZ
Defendant:
DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN LORETTO FCI
CABRERA ARTEAGA v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv05441
Petitioner:
SANTOS EDELMIR CABRERA ARTEAGA
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SWONTEK v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
BRIAN SWONTEK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stokes v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
as 1:2024cv00571
Petitioner:
Michael Stokes
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VALEJO v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv04421
Petitioner:
CARLOS VALEJO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nedrick Johnson v. Warden Allenwood FCI Low
as 24-1257
Plaintiff:
NEDRICK LAMONT JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI LOW
Loza v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 0:2024cv01492
Petitioner:
Javier Gonzalez Loza
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HOLMES v. FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
DOMINIQUE J. HOLMES
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwards v. Warden of FCI Edgefield
as 9:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Akeem Jamal Edwards
Defendant:
Warden of FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Leon v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Petitioner:
Luis Leon
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI-Schuylkill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
