Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Turner v. Rupf et al
as 3:2005cv02297
Plaintiff:
Edward Turner
Defendant:
Warren E. Rupf, Joe Caruso, M.D. James Rael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sturgis v. Rupf et al
as 5:2010cv03680
Plaintiff:
Lamos Wayne Sturgis
Defendant:
Warren E. Rupf, Drollete and Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tausig v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 3:2010cv02519
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Tausig
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa and Warren E. Rupf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Rupf et al
as 4:2010cv02376
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Stewart
Defendant:
Warren E. Rupf, Matthew F. Schuler and Cushman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Rupf et al
as 5:2010cv02376
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Stewart
Defendant:
Warren E. Rupf, Matthew F. Schuler and Cushman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond et al v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 3:2010cv01454
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hammond , Matthew Hammond , Emily Hammond and others
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa, Robert Reichert, Kevin Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sinclair v. Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2009cv00773
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Sinclair
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office, West County Detention Facility, Warren E. Rupf and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sturgis v. Rupf
as 4:2008cv05246
Petitioner:
Lamos Wayne Sturgis
Respondent:
Warren E. Rupf
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mendia v. Rupf et al
as 3:2008cv05205
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Mendia
Defendant:
Warren E. Rupf and Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hawkins v. County of Contra Costa, CA et al
as 3:2008cv03670
Plaintiff:
Neville Thomas Hawkins
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa, CA, Warren E. Rupf and Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
