Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16691
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN HARRELSON, WALKER, WARREN & WATKINS, LLC, DONNA MUCCINO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
In re: Warren Watkins, et al
as 11-2095
Petitioner:
In re: Warren Watkins, Elvis Gibson, Lawrence Goldblatt and others
TBF Sales, Inc. v. Graceland Fruit, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
TBF Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Graceland Fruit, Inc., Dave Porteous, Warren Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Nekoosa Marsh, LLC v. Graceland Fruit, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01141
Plaintiff:
Nekoosa Marsh, LLC
Defendant:
Graceland Fruit, Inc., Dave Porteous, Warren Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
City of Kansas City, et al v. Warren Watkins
as 08-2738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Defendant - Appellee:
Housing & Economic Development Financial Corporation
Receiver - Appellee:
David Bahner
Interested Party - Appellant:
Warren Watkins
Pritchett v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2007cv01509
Plaintiff:
Corey Pritchett
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Multnomah County Circuit Court, Multnomah County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company of The Ohio Casualty Group v. GMW & Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv01145
Plaintiff:
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company of The Ohio Casualty Group, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company of The Ohio Casualty Group and The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company of The Ohio Casualty Group
Defendant:
GMW & Company, Inc., Micheal Waldheim, AIA and Warren Watkins, AIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
